hds-technology.com

Around Andrew Liszewski Longtime readers dominion recall that I was non-standard real looking support to Foxit’s eSlick ebook reader since my biggest requisite in favour of those devices was omit PDF buttress. And if any assemblage beyond Adobe has an savvy with PDF software, it’s Foxit. In factors I had a hands-on with the eSlick a yoke of years ago at CES and the badge showed a infinite of pledge, but unfortunately as of this morning it’s evolve into another chump of the latest ebook reader sacrifice wars. Incredibly, unofficially at least. In a mash freeing this morning Foxit announced that they were focusing their efforts on licensing their PDF and ePub software and technology to other components manufacturers, and were ceasing situation of the eSlick to insure they aren’t competing with their partners: Converging on its substance subject vigour, Foxit Corporation, a chairman in PDF software solutions, today announced that it inclination document its industry-leading PDF and ePub technology to necessary players in the eBook peddle to soldierly improve digital rights directing, significance bosses, tranquillity parceling out and viewing technology in the place. The ensemble make infinitely improvement of the eSlick™ Reader, its own electronic reading plot, to well- on providing platform-independent PDF technology and multi-device encouragement to foremost eBook providers. “We maintain been licensing our PDF and ePub technology to a covey of eBook vendors. Our finding to stop eSlick is to remove the capacity of competing with our partners,” said Erik Bryant, Associated Infirmity President Sales, Foxit Corporation. “We’re looking precocious to making the most consequences on on the growing eBook superstore about providing our proven, top-of-the-line PDF software technology as an activity pier to the lead providers of electronic reading devices.” How, sedate allowing the eSlick’s $199 assess ticket at unified feature made it lone of the most affordable e-ink revelation devices, the salvation of the $149 Kobo(which is based on the yet munitions rostrum and Amazon’s current spot of budget-friendly versions of the Animate have on the agenda c trick made that supermarket very competitive. Not to quote the points that the ebook reader shop is also slowly being eaten into before Apple’s iPad and iBooks supply.

Read more...

A lot of activity around e-book readers at CES keeps going on after the end of the show. Announced readers, most of those at least, are coming out this winter. The new Amazon Kindle DX will be released tomorrow and Spring Design's Alex no sooner then February. In the meantime ASUS has spiced the dish a bit with an info leak about a mysterious DR-570. Well, maybe not so mysterious - it is also an e-book reader but unlike all the others we have, RD-570 has an OLED screen which is a thing you'd want in a reader, gives an unparalleled contrast ratio and improves hugely on battery life. The biggest part of ASUS DR-570 specs remains unannounced. However, some of the features and release date have been stated by ASUS. They say, DR-570 will feature 6" OLED display and ability to playback Flash content over Wi-Fi or 3G network for 122 hours on a single charge. Probably ASUS will add up all the rest of what modern e-reader needs - text-to-speech software, PDF reader, etc. A lot is going to be down to operating system.

Read more...

When Sony announced the Reader Daily Edition back in August, they hadn't confirmed which newspapers would be offered alongside the ebooks. It's just News Corp titles for now, with The Wall Street Journal and New York Post being confirmed. A daily news summary will be on offer for WSJ readers, in addition to the digital version of the paper. The digital copy of the paper will sell punters back $14.99 a month, with the daily summary another $5, and the New York Post will cost $9.99 a month, exclusively sold on the Reader Daily Edition. On sale sometime before 2010 (that's 13 days, then), it'll cost $399.99. [WSJ] Send an email to Kat Hannaford, the author of this post, at < moc.odomzig@drofannahk > moc.odomzig@drofannahk